June 17, 2009

Got a Decision To Make? The Old Magic Eight Ball Just Got Social.


courtesy: greeblie's photostream, FlickR
creative commons

FlickR co-founder, Caterina Fake recently rolled out Hunch, an online decision-making tool. It's sort of like the old "Magic Eight Ball", but now with collective intelligence to optimize a sort of decision making wizard.

But wait, there's more. In addition to user-generated question refinements (question/response "training"), it also uses statistical inferences associated with the discipline of machine learning.

It's all The math is beyond me, but key highlights from Hunch's "How Hunch Works" page makes for an interesting read:

  • In choosing what to ask you, Hunch's question selection algorithm tries to do two things. First, it tries to find a question which will discriminate well among the remaining possible decision outcomes for you - thus filtering the remaining choices from "many" to "fewer". Second, the algorithm looks for a question which can help optimize and rank the remaining decision results to present you with the ones you'll like the most.
  • As you answer questions, Hunch can narrow down your possible decision outcomes because each outcome can be "trained" to correspond with each question's answers.
  • Any logged in user can set initial training or correct existing training, in addition to proposing new topics, questions to ask, and decision outcomes.
  • When a user clicks "Yes" or "No" to indicate whether or not they like a decision result, Hunch incrementally strengthens or weakens the mathematical correlation between that result and any 'Teach Hunch About You' questions that have been answered so far.

June 16, 2009

Best practice in tweeting with multiple tweeps under one account - redux


I'm a little flummoxed at the moment with Typepad. It's not cooperating in making visible a fairly comprehensive comment from Jeff Hurt (blogger for the Midcourse Corrections blog) in response to my post yesterday.

If you recall, the gist is: though I currently tweet under a personal Twitter account as @melaclaro , I've also been ushering my local ASTD chapter (Orange County) into the online social sphere. As part of that effort I've helped my local chapter start tweeting a few months ago as @astdOC.

But here's the thing: I've since invited two other tweeps from our chapter's board to tweet with me under @astdOC. Nothing sinister. We're in lockstep with the messages tweeted, have always intended to do so honestly and transparently, but were simply hopeful about any synergies we might have afforded each other.

The question is, how does that square with the 'sphere?

As it turns out, we've been a little too transparent, perhaps.

Humans and faces in organizational Twitter profiles.

In yesterday's post, I solicited feedback about crowd wisdom on best practices in allowing multiple tweeps tweeting under one twitter organization. Jeff took time to post a well-documented rationale for listing the (human) personalities behind the veil of an organizational Twitter account. Alas, he had to resort to emailing it to me because Typepad just wasn't havin' it for some reason. (We suspect the length of the comment caused my blog theme to burp.)   

Anyway, I'm glad he thought to email it to me. Because, while Typepad-support works to resolve my trouble ticket, I can at least give respect to Jeff's comments by sharing it with you below. Please also see my response after the end quote.

Comments about multiple tweeps under one account.

----- Posted, in its entirety, on behalf of Jeff Hurt -----

Thanks Mel and since I stirred this pot, here are my thoughts.

This weekend, I was at a conference speaking on social media to association chapters. Ironically, we were discussing this very issue, as I was tweeting @ASTDOC. It was very frustrating because I did not know who I was talking with. It felt impersonal and as if it was one of those infamous computer robotic voice mail systems was trying to converse with me.

I wrote a draft to post but it was too long so I tried to edit it for quick reading. It’s still too long IMO, and yes, this is the shorter version. So here are eight reasons or examples of why not to tweet as an organization but rather as people from the organization.

1) I would suggest that the most important issues are, as you discussed, authenticity, honesty, openness and transparency. If an organization has multiple people tweet from one account, how do the readers know who is tweeting? (Not all readers are members and “in the know” of your policy that several people are tweeting, so by its very nature, you are not authentic, upfront or truthful. You are misleading the reader.) Organizations list phone numbers and emails of it leaders, why not do the same thing with Twitter accounts? 


2) A company or organization is a thing, not a person, so it cannot have a conversation. Are readers/members supposed to communicate with the organization/brand, which in itself is awkward? The people behind the brand, the logo or the curtain actually have the conversations with others. Even in the Wizard of Oz, Dorothy & her friends wanted to know who was behind the curtain. So do Twitter readers. (Would that be Tweaders? Twitter Readers.)


3) Author Rohit Bhargava of “Personality Not Included” addresses this very issue and discusses why an organization needs to have a face, to have people behind the logo and that the organization needs human stories for people to connect to. His home page says, “Don’t be a faceless organization.” He states that being faceless used to prove credibility but now shows that the organization is not to be trusted. http://www.personalitynotincluded.com/mediakit/60words/


4) ASAE (American Society of Association Executives) had to address a similar issue this past January and bloggers and Tweeps said they were being secretive and trying to hide something. ASAE had multiple people tweeting from one conference account and attendees (virtual and those present) started asking questions of the tweeter. They even asked, “Who is behind these tweets?” No one responded or identified him or herself. A host of bloggers called ASAE dishonest and not to be trusted for their position on this issue and ASAE is still taking hits for this issue today. Some members said it showed ASAE’s corporate culture. (ASAE changed their position by the way.) You can read the rest of the story here with some links to other bloggers: http://snapblogger.wordpress.com/2009/01/29/why-all-the-secrecy-a-story-of-attempted-brand-jacking/


5) Association and generation blogger Jamie Notter “outed” ASAE for not being open because they had several nameless people tweeting from one account: http://www.getmejamienotter.com/getmejamienotter/2009/01/learning-at-technology-conference.html


6) Amber MacArthur, @ambermac, new media journalist, web strategist and social media specialist (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amber_MacArthur), presented a social media keynote this weekend and recommended that people put humanness to their organizations and social media accounts. She said it was best practice and a recommendation she made to all companies and organizations that a person be identified with each organization Twitter account. 


7) I think this is similar to Guy Kawasaki’s twitter ghostwriters and the public outcry against it. The public wanted to know who was sending his tweets. http://davefleet.com/2009/03/guy-kawasaki-discloses-ghost-writers-defuses-issue/ Guy took some hits for having three additional people tweet from his account. He now identifies each author with abbreviations.


8) Last, and probably most controversial and may offend some, I submit to you that some readers of faceless organization tweets will perceive that organization has a culture of old school, top-down bureaucratic control style of management, one that does not embrace diversity of opinion, empowerment, or allow people to speak on its behalf. Faceless tweets send a message that the organization does not trust people to speak properly on its behalf and that the tweeters must get permission or approval to tweet because they could say the wrong thing. Who wants to serve with an organization like that? I seriously doubt that ASTDOC has that type of personality yet it is going to be perceived that way by some. I also think that an organization with a working board will have a personality that changes from year to year depending upon who is leading them at that time.

I, like you Mel, am a nonprofit board member, volunteer and advocate of many local, state and national organizations. I am also an employee of a nonprofit association. I have several accounts, from my work to my volunteer efforts to my board roles to my personal account. I completely understand wanting to have one voice and present a united front as an organization. On the other hand, perception is reality, with readers. Just like this weekend, I had no idea who I was tweeting with from ASTDOC and it was very frustrating. It felt like I was having a conversation with a non-entity, especially since that person never identified who he or she was. From my perspective, the ASTDOC account was a puppet being controlled by a group of people. I wanted to pull back the curtain and have a real conversation, just like Dorothy. I also wanted to say, “Will, the real ASTDOC person, please stand up?”

PS If you are going to have several people post tweets from this account, you could easily fix this issue by putting their names in the profile and abbreviations in the tweets. That way readers could identify who was tweeting.

----- End Quote -----

Changes for @astdOC

Again, I really do appreciate the feedback. And, though I disagree with one point (#2 where it's suggested that an organization "cannot have a conversation") the rest, I think is fair, and is exactly the feedback I was looking for. (What do you think? Should we explore #2 together in a future post?)

The end result...a change we made this evening to @astdOC's Twitter profile. I really like -- and agree -- with Jeff's end-point that it would help people, with whom we connect, to know who it is behind the veil, so to speak.

I love it. After all, that's the point, isn't it? To put a face to ASTD-OC and let people experience our chapter's organizational character, values and culture.

Hopefully, with this change, one of those organizational character-things you experience immediately about our local ASTD-OC chapter is that, we treasure constructive feedback and are willing to change.

Check out the new @astdOC background and bio. Over the next few days, we'll make some changes, too, in the format we use while posting our tweets. (To reveal the person behind it.)

I trust you'll let me (us) know if we're on the right track here, organizationally.

And, if you have any additional suggestions or best practices, I'd love to hear about them in the comments below. (Uh, I'm figuring Typepad has fixed the comment-posting issue thingy by now.)


If you liked this, or any of the articles on this site, please subscribe!
Are you a fellow "Tweep"? Follow me on Twitter (@melaclaro).
Or, connect with me on LinkedIn: LinkedIn.com/in/melaclaro.
Got friends? Forward this post or save it to any of the bookmarking sites below.

June 14, 2009

Is it ever okay to have multiple tweeters for one twOrganization?

So here's a question for you. How do you feel about interacting with organizations on Twitter? More specifically, what are your thoughts about multiple members of an organization tweeting under one organizational twitter account? (i.e., a twOrg?)

I'm asking because this point came up this past weekend with a friend on Twitter.

twitter_convo1.jpg

My friend's main points seem to be:

  • Not a good idea to have multiple people tweet under one organizational account. Because...
  • ...People don't like interacting with organizations, they like interacting with people. And...
  • ...Rather than having multiple people tweet under one organizational twitter account (e.g., "@orgname"), it's better to have multiple people set up accounts like "@orgname-mel", "@orgname-sam", "@orgname-sally", etc.

Now, this issue is near and dear to me because, in fact, I tweet under a few accounts. One of which is personal / individualistic (@MelAclaro). The other two being proxies for organizational personas.

Each is focused on a specific type of relationship I wish to establish. @MelAclaro, for instance, allows me the freedom to tweet about everything and anything that interests me as an individual person. This can include articles I find compelling, posts from others that I find interesting or, quite frankly, the occasional "what / where I ate for breakfast" type of tweet.

Meanwhile, @astdOC, for example, has been set up as an organizational persona to focus more specifically in learning / training industry related content within a finite geographic scope.

And, while it's not a human, per se, it is a unique entity that has its own organizational character and set of values. Character and values that we -- members -- hope others get to know better.

At the moment, it's set up in a way that three of us on the board can tweet through that one account. The internal guidelines we established for ourselves is to tweet respectfully, in alignment with our organization's values and mission, and in accordance with cultural norms of the "pay it forward" philosophy of the social sphere.

And, though my friend raises good points, I see two disadvantages:

1. Individual account holders (e.g., astdOC-mel, astdOC-Sally, astdOC-Sam, etc.) attenuates the overall reach of any single message, thereby diluting the organization's ability to propagate its message, and those of others it helps through retweets, and so on.

2. It has a tendency to devolve to individualistic perspectives. (Again, pitting what @astdOC-mel -- the individual -- ate that morning for breakfast vs. staying "on message" with what @astdOC -- the collective -- "thinks" about the value of CPLP certification or the merits of workplace learning and performance, say).

And, while I do feel it's appropriate for organizations to establish one collective presence PROVIDED THAT it can do so with transparency, consistency, and a unified voice communicating shared values, at the end of the day, its the social sphere within which we, as an organization, have to engage. So, if we're doing something that's inherently against social norms, I'm not opposed to making recommendations about shifting our organizational behavior.

So, on behalf of our non-profit association, I've put the question out there in a couple of forums, this blog, this poll and a few social networks.

We're willing to shift with the wisdom of the crowd... so I'm askin' ya... what do you think? Do we make it so only one tweep tweets on behalf of the organization? Or, is it okay to have multiple tweeters under one twOrg?


If you liked this, or any of the articles on this site, please subscribe!
Are you a fellow "Tweep"? Follow me on Twitter (@melaclaro).
Or, connect with me on LinkedIn: LinkedIn.com/in/melaclaro.
Got friends? Forward this post or save it to any of the bookmarking sites below.

June 07, 2009

My blog radar.

Each day, I try to make it a habit to accompany my morning coffee with a read of the various blogs I follow through RSS. When I come across articles that pique my interest, intrigue me, or challenge my thinking in some way, I save them under various keyword tags on my social bookmarking account for later reference. For example, case studies, presentations, social-networks will all come in handy for a presentation I'm preparing.

In addition to the links above, I listed below a few of the articles in the last week that made it on my radar.

If you end up browsing through some of these, you'll get a feel for the kinds of articles that make it on my radar. And, with that information in hand, if you have related articles you know about that you think I'd appreciate, I'd love to hear about them.

Share and share alike, that's fair, isn't it?

What else have you come across in the past week that you think I should add to my list?


If you liked this, or any of the articles on this site, please subscribe!
Are you a fellow "Tweep"? Follow me on Twitter (@melaclaro).
Or, connect with me on LinkedIn: LinkedIn.com/in/melaclaro.
Got friends? Forward this post or save it to any of the bookmarking sites below.

June 05, 2009

Twitter Follow Friday - June 5, 2009


followfriday.png

If this is your first time to my "Follow Friday" series, click here to find out more about this curious Twitter culture.

For the FollowFriday Hall of Fame, click here.

The gist is this: There are tweeps (Twitter people) whom I think are worth following. And I want my network to know about them so you'll have the benefit of knowing them, too. But, while the Twitter culture has adopted the pattern of simply listing names, I've decided to use this space every friday to give you more info about why I think the folks I recommend are worth recommending.

This week's follow friday list, in no particular order:

  • @MindBridj. (aka, MindBridj.com.) Why? Well, full disclosure, I'm its Chief Evangelist. I won't plug it too much, but I do want you to know about it. In part, so you can give me feedback as I move forward and expand its niche-y footprint. Though I've already been putting the business model to work for a few years, I only recently turned on its online presence. MindBridj is a small business helping small businesses (local speakers, trainers and presenters) transform their message for delivery on an eLearning platform via the web. I haven't done a full-court press on it yet ('seems to be gaining traction on new projects right now at a nice manageable pace), but I would appreciate any constructive feedback as I continue to add services.
  • @hubspot (aka, HubSpot.com.) Why? I think these guys do social media/social networking right. They help educate and enable people and businesses in the 'sphere about how best to engage in the 'sphere without asking anything more in return for that effort than the price of mutual engagement and participation. Yes, I have no illusions about them being a for-profit business. But, the approach this group takes isn't to be in our faces about retaining their services. Rather, they do it right. Engage us, educate us, help us, and then let us make consider at what point we're ready to retain them. While I'm at it, let me also let you in on a free marketing training series HubSpot is hosting. Registration is free--click here.)

  • @astdOC (aka, American Society for Training and Development, Orange County Chapter.) Why? The organization started the year with a mission to add engagement through social media to its mix of communication vehicles. I can't say there haven't been--and don't continue to be--some growing pains with that, but the board and its members continue to move forward. They're growing everyday in the social media activities they engage in. Keep an eye on this group, they'll continue to grow in the coming year.

  • @animationmentor (aka, Animation Mentor). (Full disclosure: I'm related to one of the veeps.) Whether or not they've thought about it in the way I'm saying it here, I think long before we were all calling social media what it is today, they were already doing much of it. I mean, 5 years ago, they were already engaging people and students online. Animation Mentor teaches aspiring digital/animation artists (y'know, Pixar- and ILM-types) the skills required to be a viable animator... and they do it all online. They've got a great program. They've been growing and continue to do so. I've been seeing them engage the online social sphere more and more in recent months. I hope to see that trend continue; I think they have much to offer the social media space.

That's it for this week... If you're on Twitter, take a look at the four tweeps above. They're worth following. And, if you do, tell 'em, @MelAclaro sent ya. :)


If you liked this, or any of the articles on this site, please subscribe!
Are you a fellow "Tweep"? Follow me on Twitter (@melaclaro).
Or, connect with me on LinkedIn: LinkedIn.com/in/melaclaro.
Got friends? Forward this post or save it to any of the bookmarking sites below.

May 31, 2009

Google Wave's Rosie-new possibilities for online collaboration across languages.


The presentation above is from Day 2 of the recent Google I/O Conference; it previews Google Wave, due out sometime later this year.

In a nut, I was pretty impressed with the scope of channels Google Wave expands for real time communications. I won't rehash a summary of the features. For that, PCMag has posted a pretty good summary here.

Suffice to say, I'm looking forward to it. I've signed up to be informed about the rollout and am already thinking about some of the possibilities for online learning support and how I might be able to integrate Wave down the road with MindBridj. (MindBridj is a new venture I recently started and haven't really said much about yet. More later. (??))

So, rather than rehash all the features of Google Wave in this post, I simply want to highlight the one feature that impressed me even more than the others. It's called Rosie.

What I Love About Rosie

The reason Rosie impresses me is because it addresses one of the pain points I see with social media at the moment. That is, how do I connect with someone on, say,Twitter or Facebook who speaks only French? Or only Spanish? While I speak primarily English?

Wouldn't you agree there's a language barrier today (time zone differences aside) that prevents many of us from communicating globally in real time?

Rosie may change that.

Who Is Rosie?

Rosie is a "bot."

What it (she?) does is translate.

Rosie speaks about 40 different languages. Her main role in Google Wave is to translate discussions between participants who speak different languages.

In the demo above, Lars Rasmussen (Google Maps-guy) and his team showed a chat feature in which one participant, chatting in English, had the text of his message showing up, as French, in another user's window. And vice versa. All this in real time.

Now, I have no illusions that some words won't (yet) translate 100%. But, my philosophy is, if you don't start, we ain't never gonna arrive. This is a great step in the right direction and builds upon the milestones already previously established by other translator services, such as Google's existing Translate service.

See Rosie In Action

If you want to see the demo without sitting through the entire 80 minutes of video, then scrub forward to about time code 1:13:00. (Maybe a little before that.) It's toward the end. Not surprisingly, they chose to close their demo with Rosie.

And, if that piques your curiosity, here are some other timecodes I also found interesting:

  • 0:08:40 to 0:10:15 - demo of new functionality in email-type threaded conversations.
  • 0:20:45 to 0:23:00 - demo that shows possibilities for live blogging interactivity.
  • 0:57:35 - "twave". (What else? No app is complete these days without a Twitter API.)
  • 1:12:55 - the Rosie demo.

If you check it out, I'd love to hear your thoughts. I'd especially enjoy hearing from some of you who are in any way involved with training, coaching or learning.


If you liked this, or any of the articles on this site, please subscribe!
Are you a fellow "Tweep"? Follow me on Twitter (@melaclaro).
Or, connect with me on LinkedIn: LinkedIn.com/in/melaclaro.
Got friends? Forward this post or save it to any of the bookmarking sites below.

May 30, 2009

Creative elegance, the twitterverse and the conversation prism

I feel like that old Army commercial from back in the 80s / 90s. You might remember,

"...we do more by nine a.m. than most folks do in a whole day..."

Maybe be it's gym-procrastination that's ailing me, but it seems I've scanned a lot of stuff this morning already (and it's only 7:30 a.m. as I type...THIS word).

I still have to do my run on the gerbil-mill (my wife's term for the treadmill), but before I head out, I was compelled to share with you three things that jumped out at me this morning; they're related in their elegance.

The Twitterverse

I came across Brian Solis and Jesse Thomas' Twitterverse diagram a couple of days ago. It nicely categorizes, in an elegant galaxy-type metaphor, many of the various apps that make Twitter so viral these days. They're soliciting your input for anything they may have missed or if any of the apps need to be repositioned. Feel free to give your feedback as a comment on their FlickR site here. You can also download the image under a creative commons license from the same site.

twitterverse.jpg

The Conversation Prism

Related to the Twitterverse is The Conversation Prism. This has actually been around a while, but has recently been made available as a poster for purchase. (It's by the same guys who produced the Twitterverse above, which leads me to believe that we'll soon be seeing a similar poster offering for the diagram above, as well.)

They're making the poster available for $20 (as of this writing) here.

conversationprism.jpg

Creative Elegance: The Power of Incomplete Ideas

I just started reading through this easily-digestible PDF (free) about the power of idea exchange. What I found compelling about it so far is the resonating thought that ideas need not be concrete and complete to be the most imaginative, elegant and engaging. It's a free download from the ChangeThis web site (here).


creatvelegance.jpg


If you liked this, or any of the articles on this site, please subscribe!
Are you a fellow "Tweep"? Follow me on Twitter (@melaclaro).
Or, connect with me on LinkedIn: LinkedIn.com/in/melaclaro.
Got friends? Forward this post or save it to any of the bookmarking sites below.

May 29, 2009

Twitter Follow Friday - May 29, 2009


followfriday.png

If this is your first time to my "Follow Friday" series, click here to find out more about this curious Twitter culture.

For the FollowFriday Hall of Fame, click here.

The gist is this: There are tweeps (Twitter people) whom I think are worth following. And I want my network to know about them so you'll have the benefit of knowing them, too. But, while the Twitter culture has adopted the pattern of simply listing names, I've decided to use this space every friday to give you more info about why I think the folks I recommend are worth recommending.

This week's follow friday list, in no particular order:

  • @jonathangood. (aka, Jonathan Good.) Why? Jonathan is CEO and founder of Hello Social Media. And, a kindred spirit. He was kind enough to visit our local ASTD-OC chapter the other evening to help us "change hearts and minds" and spread the word about social media. His presentation was very well received, as evidenced by the bunches of questions asked that evening. Keep one eye on this guy... he's goin' places. 
  • @Venderleys. (aka, Paul Venderley.) Why? Well, besides the fact that he's obviously trolling for follows, as evidenced by his tweet just an hour ago that people follow well, him (couldn't resist diggin' ya a little, Paul) ;) he's actually a great guy and is a star in our local ASTD-OC chapter. And, along with me and a few others in our local chapter, Paul is onboard with the rest of us on the power, value and sheer elegance of the wisdom of the crowd. 
  • @jenisecook (aka, Jenise Cook.) Why? Jenise, founder of Ridgeview Media, an eLearning Design & Development boutique, is a new-comer to Twitter but, man! she gets it and is totally onboard with the "pay it forward" philosophy of social media. At this early stage in Twitterville, she has even already customized her Twitter profile to a very professional, very cool informational piece. And, she, along with @venderleys and the person next on my list (below) are co-conspirators in my goal of assimilating the local members of our ASTD-OC chapter to "the collective". (Uh, collective wisdom of the crowd, that is.) 
  • @janetplanet8 (aka, Janet DiVincenzo.) Why? Janet, another star in our local ASTD-OC chapter, is the other co-conspirator in the collective. And, she's also pretty connected in the field of training and instructional design. She's also keen to help a fellow peep make connections. Keep an eye on Janet. Great tweep to tweetup.

That's it for this week... If you're on Twitter, take a look at the four tweeps above. They're worth following. And, if you do, tell 'em, @MelAclaro sent ya. :)


If you liked this, or any of the articles on this site, please subscribe!
Are you a fellow "Tweep"? Follow me on Twitter (@melaclaro).
Or, connect with me on LinkedIn: LinkedIn.com/in/melaclaro.
Got friends? Forward this post or save it to any of the bookmarking sites below.

May 28, 2009

Favorite 10 Tools For Creating Learning

I'm following up on my blog post from yesterday (?) on the Top 25 Tool Sets for Learning Professionals.

I appreciate the effort Jane Hart has put in to compile her list over the last three years. And, while her "Top 100 Tools" list is interesting, my favored list is the one she derives from feedback she receives to the Top 100. That is, the 25 Tools: A Toolbox for Learning Professionals list which I wrote about the other day.

So, for Jane: in support of your continuing effort (and, thanks again for doing this, keep it up), here's my 10 tools contribution. (BTW, for those of you cool folks who follow my antics here and/or on Twitter, LinkedIn or Facebook and you're in the Learning profession, I'd encourage you to send your feedback to Jane for her compilation. You can find out more info about how to do that on her "Share Your Top 10 Tools" page.

My guidance for favorite 10 tools for learning

In submitting my favorites list below, I'm using the following guideline for "favorite." That is, a "favorite" tool is one that I use for creating learning for others. And, though I'm also submitting the name of a specific tool on each line item below (because I think that's asked for), I'm leading with the type of tool that it might be grouped under... (Gah! I'm over-thinking again. Okay, I'll shut up. Here's my list.)

1. A tool for storyboarding. For this, I'll say PowerPoint . It's easy, I grew up with it, I can use it without thinking about the mechanics of the software.

2. A rapid authoring tool. Articulate (the whole suite).

3. But, because Articulate doesn't handle branching too well (though it can manage it to a degree), I'll also add Adobe's Captivate as my number three pick. That's mainly for its branching capabilities.

4. A non-linear video editing tool (because I do a lot of that stuff.) Apple's Final Cut Pro .

5. An audio editor with robust noise filters: Apple's Soundtrack Pro .

6. Then there are those projects where we need to show how to do something online. For these, a nifty screen capture software/editor is handy: Techsmith's Camtasia Studio is still my favorite (this year) for the clean codec engine (encoder/decoder) Techsmith has created. (Though, this time next year I may be touting Ambrosia's Snapz Pro software... it's a Mac-thing, don't ask.)

Context is important for learning to take place

Now, here's the thing. The tools above are those I consider as my favorites for doing "grunt work" creation. That is, in creating the components of the whole learning program, for lack of a better of word at this late hour.

But eventually, those components all have to be served up in a contextual platform. My argument is that it's the platform, and the context it can help facilitate, is where learning really takes off.

So, in that regard, I think Learning Management Systems, Content Management Systems and (of course) Social Networking Platforms all play a role.

7. Learning Management System: I've recently become enthralled with JoomlaLMS .

8. And, because JoomlaLMS requires the Joomla Content Management System to function, I'll have to also list Joomla . (But, even if I weren't using JoomlaLMS, I'd still list Joomla as a robust CMS platform. It derives a lot of its flexibility and robustness to its elegant modular design and, like the iPhone, gains a lot of utility in the fact that many many third-party developers support it with modular plug-ins. That gives it a lot of functional flexibility.)

Special Note: To get a flavor for Joomla and JoomlaLMS, check out the Demo Course I just recently set up on MindBridj.com. (You can login to the Demo Course using username: demouser and password: demouser.)

9. Back to LMSs, I also like Moodle for its simplicity and open-sourcedness. (Yes, folks, I can make up new words on the fly!)

A safe environment in which to fail

10. Social network... so which one? Well, actually, while I'd be willing to list the Big 3 (y'know, Facebook, LinkedIn, Twitter) as networks where learning can happen and where learning can be supported. Remember, the guidance I'm using for "favorite tools" was that which I'd use to create learning for others.

Using that guidance, I'd be reluctant to use a public platform, like the Big 3. It doesn't give my users enough of what I call "a safe environment in which to fail." So, in that regard, I prefer creating a private social network in which my user community can play without fear of the larger consequences of failure that would otherwise hinder learning.

For this environment, I'd ordinarily list Joomla with the various social networking plugins. (Joomla, by itself, doesn't give you a social networking platform. You'd need to add the appropriate plugins for it to become that.) But, since I already listed Joomla as Item #8 above, I'd have to list either Ning or Kickapps. Mainly for their ease of use and ease of setup.

HOWEVER (big point) if pressed about which one, I'd have to say that, although I slightly prefer Ning for it's ease of use, it's important to note that Ning's terms of use technically gives Ning rights to all content -- and user lists -- associated with any networks you create. (!!) (Ning, if you come across this, please comment or clarify if that policy has changed.)

So, given the point above, I'll have to give my nod to number 10, social network platform (in support of creating learning programs) to KickApps .

That's it! What do you think of the list? How do these compare to your top 10?


If you liked this, or any of the articles on this site, please subscribe!
Are you a fellow "Tweep"? Follow me on Twitter (@melaclaro).
Or, connect with me on LinkedIn: LinkedIn.com/in/melaclaro.
Got friends? Forward this post or save it to any of the bookmarking sites below.


May 26, 2009

Top 25 Tool Sets for Learning Professionals

For three years running, Jane Hart has facilitated an annual survey for the Top 100 Tools for Learning. Votes are solicited from professionals in the Learning industry. After 107 votes so far, the tally shows (drum roll...) Twitter as having taken the number one spot. That's a bump up from eleventh place last year, and forty-third in 2007.

I'm still processing the tally.

Don't be dis-in' Twitter, man.

Now, I love Twitter. Those of you who follow my antics know that I'm an avid Tweep... can't shut me up sometimes.

I go to the tweetups (live local meetings of folks who meet on twitter), I cross-post tweets to other social networks, I'd even encourage my grandmother to tweet, if she were still alive. You can say I drink the kool-aid. But, even my initial reaction was Twitter?! As a tool for creating learning programs?!   

I mean, yes. I can see the applications Twitter has in supporting the learning creation process. But, even I was a little surprised to see it trending to #1. That places it above such creation tools as course authoring, storyboarding, mindmapping, learning management systems. I would've thought even web conferencing systems would have more ability to create learning.

More to the story.

But, don't be put off. On the "more info" page, it suggests the feedback is allowed to be more open-ended. About halfway down the page, the criteria clearly asks that each respondent provide the names of her/his 10 favorite tools for creating learning for others, for your own professional practice or personal productivity.

As such, it's broader in its interpretation and gives the opportunity to cast the net wide. In doing so, Jane compiles the subjective feedback she receives into categories. The result of which is produced in another presentation (below), the top 25 categories of learning tools.

I find the compilation below even more compelling for learning professionals. I say that because it suggests to us that, no matter what your favorite tools are, there are certain tool sets that you should have represented in your arsenal.

It's a great list and worth a look-see.

25 Tools: A Toolbox for Learning Professionals 2009


My Photo

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

Alltop Lists

  • Alltop, confirmation that I kick ass

Twitter updates

    follow me on Twitter

    • eLearning Learning Featured
    Concepts Tools Type Companies Organizations Year